![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Vol. 86, Nos. 1 - 4, pp. 1 - 148 Oct. 7 - 28, 2009 A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
JUDGES
– Capital punishment, juror misbehavior suggesting bias, trial judge inquiry (Ill.), 86:11
– Federal sentencing guidelines, fraud, ethical obligations, 86:143 – Guilty pleas
– – Interlocutory appeal of judge's rejection of sentence bargain (9th Cir.), 86:5
– – Participation, ban in absence of plea agreement (8th Cir.), 86:105
– Capital punishment, juror misbehavior suggesting bias, trial judge inquiry (Ill.), 86:11
– Double jeopardy, mixed verdicts on charges with shared essential elements, retrial (5th Cir.), 86:140 – Honest services fraud, elements of proof, jury bias (rev grant), 86:82 – Sentencing, habeas corpus, jury trial, federal remedy for sentence imposed in violation of Cunningham (9th Cir.), 86:14 – Type of firearm used during offense, jury findings (U.S., rev grant), 86:19
– Homicide, inference of malice from use of deadly weapon (S.C.), 86:109
– Fair cross-section requirement, comparative-disparity test (U.S., rev grant), 86:18
– Capital punishment, guilty plea offer to withdraw request did not coerce waiver (U.S., vac and rem), 86:110; text, 86:115
– National Security Division, advantages of new structure, 86:112
– Pot-friendly states, federal charges against legal users, DOJ policy, 86:141
– Cruel and unusual punishment, recidivist sentence, juvenile adjudication as prior predicate (Iowa), 86:69
Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |